Basketball Truly Is the City Game

by Jared Wade on August 31, 2010 at 1:12 pm · 1 comment

Last week, Wired’s Frontal Cortex blog featured an enlightening article that puts an interesting, in their words, “addendum on the 10,000 rule,” which famously suggests that virtually anyone can achieve success in any field if he or she just practices the task for 10,000 hours. (This means practicing 20 hours a week for 10 years and is detailed in Malcolm Gladwell’s stellar book Outliers.)

This new wrinkle suggests that it’s not just time but location that matters — at least when we’re talking about sports. I can’t summarize the whole concept better than the author did, so just click through and read the piece, but the general premise is that kids from more rural areas are more likely to become professional athletes despite the fact that 52% of Americans live in cities of 500,000 people or more.

Interesting stuff. (h/t Cools)

And to the basketball junkie in me, the most interesting stuff is how much more urban the NBA is than the other major team sports. Obviously, we already knew this. But basketball has been called “the city game” so many times that it has just become cliché at this point. And like people calling baseball “the national pastime” even though most people prefer things like watching football, eating bacon and GTLing, calling basketball “the city game” just starts to seem like something to say rather than a fact-based statement.

But the percentages (which I’m sure aren’t new … but they are new to me so humor me) are staggering:

The percent of professional athletes who came from cities of fewer than a half million people was far higher than expected. While approximately 52 percent of the United States population resides in metropolitan areas with more than 500,000 people, such cities only produce 13% of the players in the NHL, 29% of the players in the NBA, 15% of the players in MLB, and 13% of players in the PGA.*

I’m not going to speculate on all the many socioeconomic, cultural and other reasons for this. But it is quite a chasm.

manhattan

{ 1 comment }

Free agency is basically over so teams looking to improve must resort to the trading block. That’s why our A Walk Around The Block series will take a look at different aspects of the trading block, from players likely to move and teams that might make moves to reasons why these trades may happen and some fun trade proposals of our own. Today we look at the epitome of inefficiency, Monta Ellis.

51656832

Monta Ellis is pretty much the reason per game numbers are all but obsolete.

At first glance, one would think Monta is a top-notch NBA player. Last year, he scored 25.5 points per game, to go with 4 boards, 5.3 assists, and 2.2 steals? Where can I sign up, right?

Well, no.

Those seemingly impressive numbers fail to convey how Monta’s 2009-10 season set records across the board as far as selfish, inefficient offense goes. I could throw out the advanced stats, if it makes you feel better. Monta led the NBA at field goal attempts per game, clocking in at 22 shots a night, while posting a ghastly true shooting percentage of 51.7% and an even worse effective field goal percentage of 47.6%. He posted the 8th-highest usage rate in the league, at 27.0, while putting up only the 78th best PER (16.74), if catch-all stats are your cup of tea. And if you still think per game numbers mean anything, he led the league with 3.8 turnovers a night (though to his credit, his turnover rate of 11.3 was better than I thought it would be while researching this piece).

But even as bad as that random assortment of digits is, things were much, much worse.

Monta handled the ball almost exclusively for the first few months of the season (before Stephen Curry was finally given the reins), and it showed. Golden State’s offense was often reduced to “dribble, Monta, dribble!” Monta, compliant as he is, dribbled and dribbled and is probably still dribbling right now.

As such, it is very hard to take his numbers with perspective.

A strong figure of 5.3 assists suddenly turns into “you have the ball every time down the court, you better find your teammates for open shots.” His 4 rebounds a night – while certainly not bad for a player standing 6’3” – becomes “anybody can run into 4 random loose balls a night when playing 42 minutes at the league’s fastest pace.”

When a player spends an entire season blatantly gunning for his own box score, effect on the team be damned, every positive move comes with a negative asterisk. So instead of remembering the games he finished with 40+ points (three), we remember those with 30+ shot attempts (also three, including a vomit-inducing 14 for 39 night against Chicago). And instead of remembering the near triple-doubles, we remember the near triple-doubles that involved double-digit turnovers.

The most discouraging part is that not long ago Monta was the golden standard for efficiency in the ever-expanding “shooting guard in a point guard’s body” category. It’s easy to forget, but Monta was a vital cog on that magical 2006-07 Warriors squad, winning the league’s Most Improved Player award after making the leap from end-of-the-bench-prospect to the speedy scoring force he is today.

Following that season, the Warriors even felt confident enough in Monta to trade star shooting guard Jason Richardson. And Monta came up huge again, averaging 20.2 ppg while shooting at superb rates (FG%: 53% FGs, TS%: 58%) that he achieved by relentlessly taking the ball to the rim and making tough layups, bankers, floaters, whatever. Of the 15.2 shots Monta took every game in 2007-08, six of them came at the rim, where he converted 66% of his shots. Again, he is a 6’3” guard. That’s unreal.

Then came two separate incidents that threw Monta’s ever promising career off track.

The first was the departure of Baron Davis. When in Golden State, Baron showed the play-making abilities that Clipper fans have been deprived of since his arrival, and Monta was a main beneficiary. Without little ball-handling responsibility, he could focus solely on getting to the rim, either drawing fouls or making shots — and often both.

But once Baron left, Monta became the team’s de facto point guard, now concerned with creating shots for others and not just for himself. For evidence that Monta’s game severely misses Baron, look no further than the percentage of shots Monta was assisted on. From 46.5% in 06-07 and 45.4% in 07-08, Monta fell to 32.5% in 08-09 and 35.8% in 09-10, further cementing Baron’s decision to play for LA’s JV team as the worst decision for everybody ever.

The second career trajectory altering factor, of course, was the bizarre moped incident that I still have no idea how to describe or digest. For those who don’t remember, after signing 6-year, $66 million extension during the summer of 2008, Monta tore a ligament in his left ankle, an injury that required surgery. Initially telling the team that he injured the ankle playing pick-up basketball, it later turned out that Ellis was injured in what was described a “low-speed mo-ped accident.” Since riding mo-peds is against the terms of the standard NBA contract (makes you wonder what other insane clauses are on those things), and of course, since Monta lied about the injury, the Warriors suspended Monta for the first 30 games of the 08-09 season (which he missed anyway), after flirting with the notion of voiding his contract for quite a while.

The active part of Monta’s 08-09 season was pretty much marred with signs of rehab – a player who relies so greatly on his superhuman speed can’t play with a bad ankle. While Monta recovered and seemed healthy to start 09-10 (he still missed 18 games with various injuries), the bad blood remained. Monta felt unwanted, see-sawing between trade requests and “I’m here to stay” statements before calming down when play actually started.

And that leads to the the biggest problem with Monta: he’ll never be a good defender, usually disinterested in the entire ordeal, accumulating steals with bad gambles andnot much else. He is by all accounts an offensive machine when playing to his strengths, asked only to be a scorer and not a facilitator, and not given the ball every time down the court.

But the constant off-court issues and questionable ability to acquire a team-first mentality are always hanging over his play.

Will He Be Traded? Should He Be Traded?

The reasons why the Warriors should trade Monta are best explained by Monta himself. Before last season, Monta publicly complained about the pairing of him and then-rookie Stephen Curry, saying they can’t play together because none of them can guard shooting guards.

This rant shows you the two main reasons why Monta and the Warriors should go their separate ways:

A) Yet another in a long line of selfish, team-killing incidents, this rant may (should) have been the last straw. With so much bad blood between Monta and the Warriors over the moped incident and all that followed. (It should be noted, however, that long-time owner Chris Cohan finally sold the team this summer, taking most of the Warriors’ self-sabotaging front office with him. Still, I find it hard to believe that there are warm feelings between Monta and the franchise.) When a player publicly bashes a team’s prized rookie, he should be on his way out.

B) Monta was absolutely right.

The Curry/Ellis back court just isn’t big enough to compete defensively. It’s not just that both players are 6’3”. It’s that both of them are a small 6’3”, weighing in at 185 and 180 pounds, respectively. If that’s not enough, both of them are very poor defenders to begin with. Despite the explosive offensive potential the two can combine for, other back courts routinely have field days facing them.

And if one of the two has to go, it should be the disgruntled, troubled veteran with four years and $44 million left on his deal, not the second-year future face of the franchise.

The only question is whether the Warriors’ new front office realizes this.

While there is no chance that they are worse than the Cohan/Riley group that held the Bay Area hostage for the past few years, they also might not be very enthusiastic to move one of their best players for the very little that should be available.

How little?

(Segue complete.)

Monta Ellis

The Asking Price

Last season, Golden State reportedly turned down a trade that would have sent Ellis to Memphis for OJ Mayo and Hasheem Thabeet, an utterly idiotic offer by the Grizzlies and an even dumber move by Golden State to say no. The chances that Ellis can draw similar package are now extremely slim. There are very few players with Mayo’s skill available, and even fewer on squads willing to move them for players with Ellis’ issues.

In fact, I’d be surprised if the Warriors can even get a prospect as good as Thabeet in return for Monta. Even though teams seem surer than ever to bring in notorious headcases – Josh Smith, Jamal Crawford and Zach Randolph are coming off the heels of breakout years, and Ron Artest just won a championship for crying out loud – there is a certain threshold of talent teams will be reluctant to part with for such a gamble. In Monta’s case, that threshold might be near zero.

The Warriors have already moved Corey Maggette for cap relief this summer, and there are talks that Andris Biedrins could be moved in a cost-cutting move as well. If they can get Monta’s salary off the books, with or without moving Andris, they could be in very good shape to surround Curry and new All-Star big man David Lee with some complementary talent. As such, I think cap relief should be enough to do the trick, unless new management holds Monta in very high regard.

The Fits

Of course, any team acquiring Monta will have to pay the high price of his contract, even if only expiring contracts are needed to pull off the actual trade. Since I presume the Warriors will ask for very little, and few teams will come knocking on their door, we’ll scratch the usual fake trade bit and instead look to see if anybody will want to pull the trigger.

Now, the way I see it, there are two sets of qualifications a team must meet if it is to acquire Monta. Any possible suitor has to belong to one of two groups:

Group A

  • Have a strong locker room and/or a veteran coach who could channel Monta’s game into the efficient scorer he once was while making it clear to him that he is not a first option
  • Have a big point guard or an otherwise strong enough defensive squad to let Monta guard points without being one on offense
  • Need another perimeter scorer enough to allow themselves a gamble
  • Be strong enough financially to allow themselves the long term commitment that is Monta

Group B

  • Be utterly and completely insane.

The sad thing is, that I don’t see many teams in Group A. The Lakers don’t need more scoring and they certainly don’t need more headaches; the Celtics already have a smaller, lesser version of Monta in Nate Robinson, and don’t have the minutes to offer Monta even if he came instead of Nate; the Magic could use another scorer, but they need it to come from the outside, and Monta is best utilized as a driver, not to mention pairing him defensively with the diminutive Jameer Nelson could be disastrous; the Mavs already have three undersized shooting guards, all of whom are better outside shooters than Monta and require the ball less.

As far as contenders go, there is really only one team who makes any sort of sense for Monta basketball wise: the Spurs. If Tony Parker is intent on leaving the squad, Monta could step into his shoes as the small point guard who gets to the rim and wreaks havoc. However, the Spurs are so intent on chemistry – and Parker is so much better than Ellis – that it will never happen. And to be honest, even if Tony wants to leave (and I don’t buy it), I sincerely doubt the Spurs move him, which is why you’re not going to see a Tony Parker edition in this A Walk Around The Block series.

This brings us to the crazy category.

The Grizzlies might renew their interest in Monta for absolutely no reason; the Bobcats need a point guard and might not realize Monta isn’t one, and Larry Brown could always talk himself into a Monta Captain Jack re-union before getting sick of both of them 10 games in; the post-Lebron Dan Gilbert has yet to do something truly crazy since his comic sans implosion, and can’t be counted out; and of course, David Kahn is still alive and acquiring small guards with a vengeance.

Final Verdict

Despite the large number of teams I threw out in the previous category, you’ve probably realized that I’m kind of stretching. As talented as Monta is, especially in the no-hand-check era, he brings the kind of headaches that only the league’s best coaches can afford to deal with. And those coaches are usually employed by teams that are too good to need Monta.

Chances are, if the Warriors truly want to move him, some team will be desperate enough for talent to gamble. However, the Warriors themselves don’t boast large amounts of talent on their squad (seriously, look at that roster, it’s frightening once you get past the starting five). With new management apparently content on breaking in slowly (give me another reason not to fire Don Nelson), I doubt the motivation to move Monta will be strong enough to find a partner.

don Nelson

{ 0 comments }

Free agency is basically over so teams looking to improve must resort to the trading block. That’s why our A Walk Around The Block series will take a look at different aspects of the trading block, from players likely to move and teams that might make moves to reasons why these trades may happen and some fun trade proposals of our own. Today we look at Philly’s miscast franchise player, Andre Iguodala.

Andre Iguodala

(AP Photo/John Raoux)

A 6’6” wing with unfathomable athleticism, the first thing that pops into your head when you say “Andre Iguodala” is freak of nature. Not of Lebron-ian proportions, but as close as you’ll probably get. The man just doesn’t break – playing 486 games of a possible 492 throughout his career, and averaging 38.1 minutes a night. If you have Iggy, you have him 82 times a year.

In today’s injury plagued NBA, that’s almost as valuable as what he actually brings to the table.

And he brings quite a lot, on both ends of the floor. With his unique combination of size and speed, Iggy is one of the best perimeter defenders the league can offer. He can be counted on to guard the opponent’s best perimeter player night in and night out – a commitment far from trivial among today’s top players.

His numbers don’t scream defensive superstar – the 1.8 steals per night he averages over his career are impressive, and his already stellar rebounding has improved even more last season (6.5 boards a game, 5.5 defensively, up from 5.7 and 4.6 in 2008-09 despite playing one minute less), but one wants more than a block every two games from a player of his physical stature. And yet, as is the case so many times when discussing defense, the numbers hardly do him justice. Iggy has the little things down. He commits only 1.8 fouls per game despite constantly trying to stay in front of the best foul drawers this league has to offer, or getting 2.6 deflections a night (per Hoopsdata.com).

Conversely, it seems that on offense, Iggy’s stats go too far the other way. Chances are every single NBA fan had more than a few games where he or she would watch Iguodala all night and come out unimpressed, only to check the box score after the game and wonder how the hell he missed that near triple-double, before double-checking the game tape and realizing that those numbers didn’t help the team as much as they should.

The truth, as always, is somewhere in the middle.

Iguodala has excellent court vision and is one of the best wing passers this league has, clocking in at nearly 5.8 assists per night with a mad impressive 23.57 assist ratio (0.15 better than LeBron James, for the sake of comparison). You’re probably in trouble if he’s your premier ball handler, but you could do worse than his 10.9 turnover rate. He is a monster in transition, usually dunking the ball before the other team even knows possession has switched. And yet, he is a terribly inefficient scorer, posting only a 53.5 true shooting percentage last season. As most TS%s go, this stems mostly from shooting too many threes (only 31% off 3.7 attempts a night) and long twos (39%, 4.3 attempts) while not getting to the free-throw line enough (5.2 attempts per night, which is nice, but he has already posted seasons of 6.2, 6.4 and 7.3 attempts a game, so we know he can do better).

There are two mitigating factors here for Iggy in all this.

First, 2009-10 was by all means a down season for him. If you go back to 2009-10, his TS% was a much better (though still troubling) 56%. One sees that throughout 2009-10, Iggy drove to the hoop much less often (4.9 shots a night at the rim in 2008-09, 3.9 in 2009-10), and converted those shots at a much lesser rate (73% and 68.5%, respectively). This is a trend that has been going on for some time; in 2006-07 Igy’s TS% was 56.3%, and in 2007-08 it was 54.3%.

I have no idea why Iguodala is less efficient in even years than in odd ones, but it does bode well for this season.

The other mitigating factor is that Iguodala is forced to create most of his team’s shots – either for himself or for his teammates. And as most NBA stars are prone to do, this leads to a certain type of laziness, where he would rather launch shots from far away than take it to the rim. The trouble here, of course, is that he’s just not a good outside shooter.

But if you look all the way back to his first two seasons in the league – way back when his shots were being created by the likes of Allen Iverson and Chris Webber, and not by himself – one sees Iggy’s best shooting percentages of his career. In his rookie and sophomore seasons, respectively, he posted true shooting percentages of 58% and 59.8%, field goal percentages of 49.3% and 50%, and three-point percentages of of 33.1% and 35.4%. Those are all by far better than his past four seasons — and they give us hope that Iguodala’s shooting can again improve around better teammates.

With two very capable young creators in Jrue Holiday and Evan Turner, Iguodala might get more open shots (of course, with Doug Collins as coach, he may be left on the isolation 30 times a night, but we’re glass half full). If he can get back to to the vicinity of those numbers from the outside, while making a conscious effort to get to the rim and to the line, and still creating for his teammates at a rate most wing players can’t even dream of,  we’re talking about a perennial All-Star, not a perennial snub.

Problems like ego and habit may stop him from changing his game back to how he played as an unproven youngster – and of course, it’s much easier to shoot better as a third option who takes 7-9 shots a game, and not as a star who takes 14-16 shots a game. But the ability is there. And the benefits that both he and his team will reap from such a mental switch would be huge.

Throw everything together and what you get is the rare type of player who is somehow both overrated and underrated at the same time. Considering the logical implications of a single entity simultaneously meeting criteria for two conflicting states of being, one would be inclined to say that Iguodala could bring the universe as we know it to an end.

I’ve always wanted to finish a scouting report with that statement.

Money to Burn

Will He Be Traded? Should He Be Traded?

Iguodala has seemingly been on the trading block ever since his rookie deal expired and was replaced by a 6-year, $80 million contract. At the time, the extension combined with the signing of Elton Brand should have vaulted the Sixers into the East’s top group. (Read this. It will make you laugh unless you’re a Sixers fan.)

Of course, when you think you’re building a perennial contender, overpaying comes much easier than when you’re a lottery team. With Brand breaking down and the Sixers going nowhere, Igoudala quickly acquired that dreaded “he’s getting paid like a franchise player but he’s not a franchise player” label. The fact that he was supposed to be Brand’s second banana and has held his part of the bargain is irrelevant – his contract is worth more money than he his, and his team is terrible despite his presence.

This means he is the bad kind of overpaid. And what happens when 26-year-olds are overpaid on teams with high payrolls and no hope for success? Well, they should be traded.

Whether they actually are traded depends on the thinking of their front office, however. And Philly’s front office has declined to trade Iggy despite numerous potential suitors. I have no official information as to what offers were made and how serious they were, but Iggy-for-Amar’e rumors were all over the place last February (how weird is that?), the Cavs were supposedly in play for Zydrunas Ilgauskas’ then-expiring contract, and ditto for the Houston Rockets and Tracy McGrady. All throughout, there was a common theme from the men in charge: we will not trade Andre for cap relief and nothing else.

Will this change? No one knows.

On the one hand, Philly drafted Evan Turner, yet another ball-handling swingman with no outside shot. Logic dictates that if you want Turner to develop – and you want him to, because he’s a star in the making – you move the similar veteran who will take away his touches. All the more so when that veteran is making three times as much as your youngster.

Of course, on the other hand (that’s the third hand for those scoring at home), the high profile hiring of Doug Collins as coach hardly screams “let’s rebuild.” And given Collins’ former broadcasting gig – which I would assume is his for the taking whenever he wants it back – the Sixers might not want to give him any motivation to leave by moving their best player. A player who, despite making more money than he would in an ideal world, is still the biggest draw for paying fans to come see the team.

So should Andre Iguodala be traded? Yes. Just like he should have been traded last season.

Will he? That depends on how committed Philly is to building something new over treading water.

The Asking Price

First and foremost, Philly would want cap relief.

This is a team on the verge of playing the luxury tax. Next season doesn’t look much better: the Sixers have slightly under $53 million already on the books for just eight players, assuming Philly picks up Marreese Speights and Jrue Holiday’s options (a no brainer). Throw in extension-eligible players Thaddeus Young (should get an extension), Spencer Hawes (might get one) and Jason Smith (will probably be let go, barring a breakout year), and the fiscal picture seems quite grim.

As such, expiring contracts would have to be a major part of any Iguodala package. If the Sixers find anybody who would take Elton Brand off their hands, they will pull the trigger before getting off the phone. I’d assume that by now, however, the Sixers realize that’s just super-mega-gravy. Getting Andres Nocioni’s deal (2-years, $13.5 million, with a $7.5 million team option on year three) will be more realistic. If Philly can strike a deal with a team under the cap (say, the Kings/Wolves/Wizards), they might also ask that team to take on the last years of Jason Kapono and Willie Green’s pointless deals, but I assume that would hardly be a sticking point.

From here on out, the search is for as many young prospects and draft picks as the Sixers can find. Whether a deal can be struck with just cap relief remains to be seen, but with Philly’s existing young core currently consisting of Jrue/Lou Williams/Turner/Young Thad/Speights/Hawes, one must assume that they will gladly accept young talent at any position except for the point.

You know, beggars can’t be choosers and stuff.

RevolutionaryBeggar

The Fits

At 26-years-old, Igoudala is just young enough to make sense for a semi-rebuilding squad … barely. If a squad is on the verge of/one year away from Playoff contention and are only projected to get better from there, he can be the guy that puts them in the postseason. But on a team going nowhere, he’s no better than he is in Philly.

In Sacramento or New Jersey, for example, he can be a great third star to complement young pieces like Tryeke Evans and DeMarcus Cousins or Devin Harris and Brook Lopez. On a team that has very little going for it in the immediate future, however, (cough, Minnesota, cough, Toronto), he will waste away.

Of course, even if you think Iggy is the final piece in your rebuilding puzzle, at his price, you better be right. If you gamble on him to elevate your squad, and it doesn’t work out, you’re pretty much in the same situation Philly is now. All this means that, like in so many of these cases, he is best suited for a team with extremely deep pockets, preferably one that is good enough without him to afford failure.

The following are a few random ideas. And, as always, the come along with the disclaimer that nobody should take them seriously.

Trade #1 – The Rockets trade Jordan Hill, Chase Budinger, Jared Jefferies and one or two first-round picks (either their own or New York’s) for Andre Iguodala

If this looks awfully similar to the Rockets trade I suggested for Carmelo Anthony … well, it’s because it is. But that’s Daryl Morey in a nutshell for you. The Rockets have so many assets – expiring contracts, promising youngsters that they can afford to let go, you name it – that they promise to appear on most fake trade lists that A Walk Around The Block will offer.

This one pretty much gives Philly everything they need. Cap relief? Check. Youngsters? Check. Draft picks? Check. It’s a great deal for them, with the only question being whether Morey wants to give up that much. Iguodala will be a great fit with the Rockets. His driving and creating would be a perfect complement to Kevin Martin and Aaron Brooks’ outside shooting, and his defense would make him the heir apparent to Shane Battier. He can also allow the Rockets to be more of a run-and-gun team whenever Yao Ming is on the bench since he is so good in transition and both Houston point guards (Brooks and Kyle Lowry) are lightning quick.

Speaking of run-and-gun …

Trade #2 – The Knicks trade Eddy Curry, Wilson Chanlder and Ronny Turiaf for Andre Iguodala and Andres Nocioni

The Knicks are shooting high with the names they’re throwing out there, from Chris Paul to Melo to Tony Parker. As such, committing to Iggy might come as a disappointment. I see it the other way around; the Knicks’ aspirations are too high, so by going for a lesser profile name in Iggy, they could reduce the price they are paying.

Unlike the Nuggets and Spurs (and to a lesser extent, the Hornets), the Sixers actually need the cap relief that Eddy Curry’s expiring contract provides. Very much so. Throw in the willingness to take on Andres Nocioni’s contract — which expires in 2012, allowing the Knicks to maintain their delusions of signing Chris Paul – and a solid young wing player to replace Iguodala in Chandler (I would assume the Sixers can ask for Bill Walker instead and the Knicks won’t mind), and this works very well.

As for the Knicks? Iguodala would be perfect for D’Antoni ball, flying up and down the court, setting up Amar’e and Gallo, and actually playing defense for a change. With Raymond Felton and Anthony Randolph filling in the starting five, and with Tony Douglas, Roger Mason Jr., Bill Walker, Nocioni and Timofey Mozgov off the bench, the Knicks should establish themselves as a Playoff squad in the ever improving East.

Trade #3 – The Mavs trade Tyson Chandler, Caron Butler and DeShawn Stevenson for Andre Iguodala and Elton Brand

Yeah, I know I said nobody will ever take Brand. And Maverick fans are probably screaming in horror right now. But hear me out.

The Mavericks have done nothing but go all in for years. From the Jason Kidd trade to the Caron Butler trade to offering every center on their roster ridiculous amounts of money, their motto has always been sparing no expense to win before Dirk Nowitzki’s window is closed. And it’s rapidly closing anyway.

Caron Butler, brought in to be the wing man that creates offense, disappointed last season. It really isn’t fair to be disappointed – after all, he came to a new team, had to learn a new playbook and really wasn’t far off from the ability he displayed in Washington before the trade that brought him to Dallas – but the bottom line is that the Mavs didn’t go as far as they hoped the trade would get them.

You know who can fill the role Caron didn’t? Iggy. Ten fold. And along with Shawn Marion, he can give them an elite wing-tandem defensively. He can also run on the break with Jason Kidd and Jason Terry and several other Jasons of your choice.

Is this a ridiculous gamble? A financial blunder of epic proportions that even Mark Cuban would be scared to take? Of course. In fact, it’s utterly idiotic in every way. But if you’re Dallas, Michael Finley-circa-2003 isn’t walking through that door. You have to gamble for that shot at a ring, and Iggy gives it to you. And when you have probably the only owner in the league that can allow himself to take on the Brand albatross, you can take that chance. That stupid, foolish, so-crazy-it-just-might-work chance.

Final Verdict

Nobody can honestly tell if Iguodala will still be in Philly when the season ends because the 76ers have insisted on showing no sign of front office consistency throughout the past few years. From win-now moves like hiring Collins to rebuilding moves like letting Andre Miller and Samuel Dalembert go to PR moves like signing Allen Iverson to just plain “WHAT ARE YOU DOING? NO! NOOOO!!!!!!!!” moves like the numerous cap-killing contracts they have accumulated over the years, they are just too random to predict anything.

That being said, I would assume that Iggy starts his seventh season where he spent the first six.

You don’t hire a new, big name coach and deprive him of his best player before seeing how they mesh. I doubt that it works well – the Sixers just aren’t good enough – but they will continue to strive for that lower seed playoff spot, as if nothing happened. If and when things go down the drain, whether it’s an early yet season-killing losing streak or friction between Iguodala and Turner on the court, numerous suitors will be waiting.

DougCollins

{ 3 comments }

Free agency is basically over so teams looking to improve must resort to the trading block. That’s why our A Walk Around The Block series will take a look at different aspects of the trading block, from players likely to move and teams that might make moves to reasons why these trades may happen and some fun trade proposals of our own. We start with Carmelo.

carmelo anthony

Last November, with the Nuggets starting the season on a tear behind Melo’s scoring, there were talks of him joining the games elite, that Lebron/Kobe/Wade like stratosphere. Even the phrase”MVP” was being thrown around on occasion. Premature and idiotic as those talks were – and indeed, months December through April did well to silence them – one can’t deny that as far as marketing and reputation go, Anthony is a full-blown superstar.

Of course, whether he actually is on that level is another question. The “is Melo an elite player?” debate was widely discussed throughout the blogosphere over the past few weeks. (We miss you, NBA. Please grab this stupid summer thing by the nose and banish it forever). Statistical master wizard (it’s when you’re too masterful to be just a wizard, but too wizardy to be just a master) Tom Haberstroh pointed out over at ESPN Insider that Melo’s greatest skill – scoring the basketball – is overblown because of his less-than-stellar efficiency at doing so.

“Let’s first talk about Anthony’s shot volume. It’s not exactly a secret that ‘Melo likes to shoot the rock, but his propensity to launch shots may raise some eyebrows. This past season, no player in the NBA took more shots per minute than Anthony — not Kobe, not LeBron, not even scoring champ Kevin Durant.

It may seem obvious that a player worthy of 20 shots per game would have a healthy conversion rate. But in Anthony’s case, that’s far from the truth. Anthony, in reality, had a below-average field goal percentage (.458) this past season — and his career percentage (.459) is no different. (The league average is .463.)

The sharp readers out there will point out that traditional field goal percentage doesn’t reflect Anthony’s shooting ability, since he launches a healthy dose of 3-pointers, which obviously count more on the scoreboard. That’s true. But if you’ve been paying attention, you know Anthony is not a good shooter from beyond the arc, so that doesn’t help his case. As a career .308 percent 3-point shooter, his shot from downtown ranks far below the norm (the average small forward shot .349 last season; Melo shot .316) and any progress he seemingly made in 2008-09, when he shot a career-high .371, disappeared. Even if we incorporate the added point bonus of a 3-pointer, the Syracuse product’s shooting percentages are, at best, average.”

The should-be-writing-much-more-often Nick Flynt then added a twist of his own, dispelling the notion that Melo is such a deadly scorer by virtue of his jumpshot:

“While I was researching this information, it came to my attention that Carmelo is known as a jumpshooter (and credited with being very good from mid-range). I assumed this to be true, mostly from anecdotal evidence. According to hoopdata.com, Carmelo Anthony actually had the 2nd most attempts at the rim of any player last season (outdone only by rookie Tyreke Evans). This is the guy known to not have the “same drive as D-Wade,” as well as being called soft, and he gets to the rim more than anyone in the league (other than one great rookie) and is one of the best rebounders at his position.

The mid-range shooter moniker isn’t totally incorrect, however, as he shot the most attempts at 16-23 feet of all swingmen (same parameters as used earlier), making just above league average at 40%. He also shot the 4th most attempts from 10-15 feet of swingmen with those same parameters.”

Finally, the one and only Zach Harper chose to analyze Melo’s game like only he can, somehow simultaneously comparing him to Kevin Durant and to dance club trilogy Step Up:

“Aside from a PER, offensive rating and win shares, the numbers are pretty even all across the board. Durant’s TS% is also much higher than Carmelo’s but considering Durant just put together a historic season at the free throw line, I don’t think you can really use that against Anthony all that much. Win shares and offensive rating are fairly damning but I still don’t believe that it disproves Carmelo being an elite player in this league.

Look to the fourth quarter of the last three seasons and you’ll see that Anthony has been far superior to Durant in clutch scoring. Yes, Durant is still so young and doing all of this at the equivalent of being a NBA toddler but it doesn’t change the fact that Carmelo bests him in a very important area despite taking a backseat to the current popular opinion of who is better between the two.”

All three make very valid points. Melo’s value as a player comes from scoring the ball first, second and third. He is an above-average rebounder for his position, a below-average defender, and an around-average ball handler and creator, depending on the night.

But he is indeed an elite scorer.

Despite the unimpressive efficiency numbers and the undeniably accurate label of a “volume shooter,” Melo possesses offensive versatility that very few players have, from driving to shooting to posting up. And with the game on the line, and that big of an arsenal, there are very few other players, if any at all, that you would like shooting the rock.

Will He Be Traded? Should He Be Traded?

If recent reports are to be believed, Anthony – long hesitant to sign a 3-year, $65 million extension that is reportedly his for the taking – wants out of Denver. If this is the case, both sides have motivation to deal him before this year’s trade deadline rather than waiting for next summer when Melo will be a free agent. And indeed, the reports indicate that both Anthony and the Nuggets have come to terms with the fact that Melo will not be a Nugget by the time the 2010-11 season ends.

From Anthony’s perspective, the motivation is financial: though he is set to become a free agent at season’s end, the upcoming collective bargaining negotiations could restrict the amount of money he could make on the open market. The Nuggets’ extension offer provides Melo with maximum cash – but then, of course, he is forced to stay in Denver. Therefore, the ideal situation for him would be to sign the extension, handpick his destination (reportedly New York, but come on, we’ve heard this too many times before), and get traded there.

As for the Nuggets, it’s the famous “we’d rather trade him over losing him for nothing” strategy that the Cavs, Raptors and Suns chose to neglect this summer (although trade exceptions are pretty valuable, so I guess that’s more than nothing). If Melo is set on leaving, then deluding yourself with visions of grandeur and contention is a waste of time – might as well get the rebuilding going now.

All of which means that, at this point, Melo seems gone.

Of course, one must still determine…

The Asking Price

Anthony’s situation is intriguing because of his impending free agency: if his contract is coming off the books anyhow, trading him for straight up cap relief is moot. This means that the Nuggets could go one of three ways (or any combination of them).

1. Uber Cap Relief
As in, you give us expiring contracts, we’ll give you Melo and our long term contracts. This seems quite unlikely, since Denver has only 4 players under contract past 2011-2012, and only two of them (Al Harrington, Chris Andersen) make more than 3 million a year (the other two are Ty Lawson and Renaldo Balkman). So unless the Nuggets are really desperate to unload their mid-level exception signings from the past two summers, I doubt they go this way.

2. We’re Still Trying to Contend
Move Melo, bring in another elite swingman instead, and keep on going. Again, unlikely, because you can’t get a player as good as Melo this way, and with the Nuggets having enough frontcourt/craziness holes as is, bringing in a player who isn’t as good as Melo but who would expect the same role will probably mean implosion.

3. Bring Me Your Young, Your Draft Picks
Pretty self-explanatory.

I would assume that the Nuggets believe that option three is better than option two, which is better than option one. Young assets are probably the key here – no deal will get done without them unless it’s a no-brainer. Cap space takes a back seat to getting serviceable players, but if such players don’t arrive, I wouldn’t be surprised if Andersen/Harrington get moved, seeing how they have no value to a rebuilding squad. Of course, this is how we expect them to act – they may just go along as if nothing happened and try to contend.

The wild card here, though, is Chauncey Billups.

Chauncey’s contract has only two more years on it – $13 million this year, and $14 million next year. With only $3.7 million of next year guaranteed, dumping Chauncey seems pointless. But with a strong point guard prospect waiting in the wings in Lawson and the Nuggets in luxury tax territory, losing that extra Chauncey cash might be just alluring enough for a salary dump that exceeds just Melo. I predict that we see a full-fledged salary dump if — and only if — Billups leaves the Mile High City along with his All-Star teammate.

The Fits

Reports are citing New York and Orlando as those atop Melo’s wish list (where have I seen those two teams on the top of a wish list before?).  The Knicks have very little to offer beyond the promise of Danilo Gallinari and Anthony Randolph, however, and the only players Orlando has on the roster who don’t posses bloated contracts (either money-wise or length-wise) are Jameer Nelson, Dwight Howard, Ryan Anderson and Daniel Orton. I’d assume the first two are unavailable and the last two aren’t enough to haul in Melo on their own. Besides, predicting what everybody else is predicting is no fun at all.

If not New York or Orlando, who else could be in the running?

It has to be at least a Playoff team, and preferably a contender. Otherwise Melo might not re-sign, and they risk trading good assets for nothing. They also have to have a somewhat stable financial foundation if they’re taking him on after he signs a 3-year, $65 million extension considering he is a player who can’t win you a title on your own. And learning from the Miami experience, one presumes Anthony would rather go to a team with another young star who he can be buddies with.

That being said, let’s throw out some hypotheticals of our own, ranging from “the least crazy” to “Ron Artest.”

(Disclaimer: In no way do I think any of these deals will happen. I’m just having fun. If you can’t deal with that, stop reading now.)

Trade #1 – The Rockets trade Jordan Hill, Chase Budinger, Kevin Martin and two first round picks (Knicks in ‘11, Knicks in ‘12) for Carmelo Anthony

This is the “of course we can compete now!” trade for Denver, which sadly, may be very very likely. Martin comes in to replace most of Melo’s scoring, and while he can’t compete with the sheer volume Melo offers, he can contribute his points more effectively. Budinger fills in at the 3, either in front, behind or next to Al Harrington (both seem to be very good off the bench). Afflalo retains the role of defensive stopper, which is why the Nuggets probably don’t compromise for similar stoppers like Shane Battier or Courtney Lee, and insist on Martin. Jordan Hill and the Knicks’ picks are for the future, though if Denver is persistent, they might get Patrick Patterson instead of Hill (I doubt Morey gives up both).

As for Houston, you suddenly have a dynamic offensive unit, with Aaron Brooks, Melo, Luis Scola, and hopefully a healthy Yao Ming. You still have your defenders in Lee, Battier, Kyle Lowry and Chuck Hayes. You have either Patterson or Hill developing in the front court. In short, you have compromised some (but not much) depth and some future assets to upgrade from Kevin Martin to Carmelo Anthony.

Hypothetical Daryl Morey runs Barter Town.

Trade #2 – The Trailblazers trade Rudy Fernandez, Greg Oden, Nicolas Batum, Joel Pryzbilla and Jeff Pendegraph for Carmelo Anthony and Chris Andersen

The more I think about this, the more I like it.

Denver gets a prospect searching for a new home in Rudy Fernandez, a potential defensive star in Nicolas Batum and cap relief by exchanging Pryzbilla’s expiring contract for Andersen’s deal. Pendegraph is filler and anything he gives will be gravy.

Of course, the big thing here is Oden. I’m still a believer in the power of Gregorious – the “BUST” cries conveniently ignore just how good he was when healthy last year. Maybe a change of scenery can do him good. Even though every indication shows that Portland has been nothing but wonderful in treating Oden, maybe losing that pressure of proving he wasn’t the wrong draft pick will do him good.

This leaves Denver with a core of Billups/Lawson/Afflalo/JR Smith/Rudy/Batum/Kenyon/Nene/Oden. A core that combines financial flexibility with unlimited defensive potential (Afflalo and Batum in the wings with Oden down low? Gulp). Oden is a risk, but I don’t think any other deal approaches this upside.

As for Portland – Andre Miller, Brandon Roy, Melo, Lamarcus Aldridge, Marcus Camby. Yeah. I know. Even if this is too much 2005 Nuggets for you (Miller and Camby aren’t any younger), this is a no-brainer.

Trade #3 – The Hornets trade Marcus Thornton, Quincy Pondexter, Peja Stojakovic and Craig Brackins for Carmelo Anthony and Chris Andersen

As much as I hate conspiracy theories, this summer has taught us that they sometimes have credence. As such, I am including this scenario solely because of the Anthony/Paul connection. This Miami super team will probably affect the league more than we realize, with All-Stars choosing to play together over staying on separate sides of the road. Since the rumors insist that Paul and Anthony want to play together, and the Hornets possess both Peja Stojakovic’s huge expiring contract and all the leverage over the squad Paul plays for next year, Melo might just end up playing in teal.

But this is still extremely unlikely from Denver’s part, because they get so little. As I mentioned earlier, cap relief for Anthony doesn’t make any sense whatsoever, and even getting rid of the Birdman does nothing to change the fact that Thornton, Pondexter and Brackins are probably not asset-y enough to get it done, beastly as Thornton may be. Maybe adding Trevor Ariza when he’s eligible to be moved again will cut it, though I still doubt Denver would bite.

Finally, the craziest deal I could think of …

Trade #4 – The Bobcats trade Erick Dampier and DJ Augustin to the Nuggets; the Suns trade Jared Dudley, Jason Richardson and Earl Clark to the Nuggets; the Nuggets trade Chauncey Billups to the Bobcats; and the Nuggets trade Carmelo Anthony and Al Harrington to the Suns

This gets a little complicated, so let’s brake it down:

Why the Bobcats Do It
Because the Bobcats have always been win now, Chauncey Billups has always been a Larry Brown guy while DJ Augustin is not, and they were going to waive Dampier anyway. This makes Charlotte much better in the short term – pretty much a Playoff lock – which is all that matters to them.

Why the Suns Do It
Because this is Steve Nash’s last shot. And as much as they love Dudley and Richardson, Melo was made for run and gun. He could finally shoot over 50% from the field with Nash giving him the ball, and he could be devastating as Nash’s new pick-and-roll guy. Melo and Turkoglu will man the two forward spots, Hill and Childress will play the 2 and the remaining minutes at the 3, and this is a scary, scary team.

Why the Nuggets Do It
Because this is how they clear the deck. Dampier is immediately waivable, Kenyon Martin, Jason Richardson and JR Smith leave after the season, probably Nene as well, and you are left with Lawson/Afflalo/Dudley/Clark as your core. If you can dump Harrington or Andersen, all the better. The biggest mistake teams make is not knowing when to call quits. With Billups and Martin aging, the Nuggets have nothing to offer in the short term without Melo. Might as well realize it.

Why Melo Does It
He gets to play with an amazing point guard in a rapidly growing city, and he eventually becomes the man when Nash retires. In the meantime, he gets to contend with a team that might be the funnest ever, competing only with every other Nash-led Suns squad. And really, what more can you ask for?

Not happening … but, ya know … it would be fun if it did.

Final Verdict

Chances are, Melo gets traded. We hear rumors like these all the time – heck, the ridiculous Chris Paul rumors are still amongst us – but this time, Melo has all the leverage, which usually ends in the player getting what he wants.

But the Nuggets have the time to hold out for a good offer. And by good, I don’t mean, “we might make the Playoffs anyway.” I mean, “we might be good again in a few years.” Because that’s the right way. In the meantime, all we can do is hope he doesn’t go to the Knicks.

Just for comedy’s sake.

It’s what keeps me alive.

Lebron James Knicks

{ 2 comments }